RobinN
Super Mom
- Messages
- 7,835
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 163
Hopefully one day this will be put into the forum Hall of Fame, but for now I will just begin the story of Rebecca's experience with Neurofeedback.
We are going to the EEG Institute in Woodland Hills, CA. It is about an hour away from our house. Her first visit was yesterday, March 13, 2008. We arrived, and of course there was the paperwork to fill out. Then we had the pleasure to meet Sue Othmer, and were taken to her office. There Rebecca was asked quite an extensive number of questions about her background. When Rebecca couldn't answer, I filled in the blanks. That took about an hour. I personally learned new information about how Rebecca's history plays a part in the world of seizures.
Rebecca was then asked to do an evaluation test. I did not watch this portion. However, there was a glitch. She seemed to do fine on the pre-test but when the answers were given, Sue said it appeared as if Rebecca had answered backwards to each of the responses. This had to do with a visual pattern and Rebecca said she answered as she was asked. So perhaps there was a malfunction with the "software". This test needs to be given again as the Institute give the test again at the end of all the sessions by comparing the two tests.
The third part of our 2.5 hr visit was a session with the EEG equipment. I was allowed to sit in on this part of the process. Rebecca was hooked up with the wires attached to her head, and on the large screen in front of her she was asked what type of pictures she would enjoy looking at. She chose kids. So to begin with there were blue dots on the screen in even rows. A ball came on the screen, and Rebecca was instructed that when her brain waves were within the range that was expected, the ball would move along the dots and reveal a square of the picture at a time. When all was going really well the ball would move quickly and appear to have a speed trail (not sure how to express that). It just looked faster. If the brain waves were not within range, the ball stopped completely.
Sue would ask Rebecca how she felt, and we had answers such as great, tired, this part of my head feels funny, etc. It was hard to tell from watching if the tiredness came from being tired, bored, being relaxed, etc. I am sure it will be more difficult at the end of the day when we come for future appts. Hopefully she can rest in the car on the way, and arrive a bit refreshed.
I learned and watched on the computer screen that Sue was monitoring, that she was working at very low frequencies. She explained that patients with seizures have extremely sensitive nervous systems.
I am sure I will understand the process more as we come for more sessions. It is a lot to take in the first day.
We then went back into Sue's office and talked about what we could expect at future appointments. How this could not only be targeted to balance out the seizure threshold, but could also target the speech and language area, as well as balance and focus for the athlete.
Rebecca seemed unimpressed with the appointment. I am not sure what she expected. We plan on doing two sessions a week, and bump up to more during spring break. It was suggested to do two in one day occasionally. So we are looking at doing one after school, and one on Saturday. We did not get one scheduled for this Saturday. Our 2nd appt is next Wednesday.
I was asked to watch and journal about changes/differences I see in sleep pattern, daily efforts, good/bad, easy/difficult... I hope to fill you all in as we move forward.
We are going to the EEG Institute in Woodland Hills, CA. It is about an hour away from our house. Her first visit was yesterday, March 13, 2008. We arrived, and of course there was the paperwork to fill out. Then we had the pleasure to meet Sue Othmer, and were taken to her office. There Rebecca was asked quite an extensive number of questions about her background. When Rebecca couldn't answer, I filled in the blanks. That took about an hour. I personally learned new information about how Rebecca's history plays a part in the world of seizures.
Rebecca was then asked to do an evaluation test. I did not watch this portion. However, there was a glitch. She seemed to do fine on the pre-test but when the answers were given, Sue said it appeared as if Rebecca had answered backwards to each of the responses. This had to do with a visual pattern and Rebecca said she answered as she was asked. So perhaps there was a malfunction with the "software". This test needs to be given again as the Institute give the test again at the end of all the sessions by comparing the two tests.
The third part of our 2.5 hr visit was a session with the EEG equipment. I was allowed to sit in on this part of the process. Rebecca was hooked up with the wires attached to her head, and on the large screen in front of her she was asked what type of pictures she would enjoy looking at. She chose kids. So to begin with there were blue dots on the screen in even rows. A ball came on the screen, and Rebecca was instructed that when her brain waves were within the range that was expected, the ball would move along the dots and reveal a square of the picture at a time. When all was going really well the ball would move quickly and appear to have a speed trail (not sure how to express that). It just looked faster. If the brain waves were not within range, the ball stopped completely.
Sue would ask Rebecca how she felt, and we had answers such as great, tired, this part of my head feels funny, etc. It was hard to tell from watching if the tiredness came from being tired, bored, being relaxed, etc. I am sure it will be more difficult at the end of the day when we come for future appts. Hopefully she can rest in the car on the way, and arrive a bit refreshed.
I learned and watched on the computer screen that Sue was monitoring, that she was working at very low frequencies. She explained that patients with seizures have extremely sensitive nervous systems.
I am sure I will understand the process more as we come for more sessions. It is a lot to take in the first day.
We then went back into Sue's office and talked about what we could expect at future appointments. How this could not only be targeted to balance out the seizure threshold, but could also target the speech and language area, as well as balance and focus for the athlete.
Rebecca seemed unimpressed with the appointment. I am not sure what she expected. We plan on doing two sessions a week, and bump up to more during spring break. It was suggested to do two in one day occasionally. So we are looking at doing one after school, and one on Saturday. We did not get one scheduled for this Saturday. Our 2nd appt is next Wednesday.
I was asked to watch and journal about changes/differences I see in sleep pattern, daily efforts, good/bad, easy/difficult... I hope to fill you all in as we move forward.
Last edited: